Christchurch shooting was strange
Anybody who has seen footage of the alleged shooting in Christchurch knows the whole thing is weird, like mind-blowingly stinks to high heaven weird.
The motive for the shooting is, as yet, unknown. There have been strong suggestions that the shooter's motive was "revenge" against a religious ideology that is incompatible with the West. A piece of evidence backs up that claim, namely the writing of the victims of multiculturalism on the sides of his firearms.
Small admittance, when he first shown the weapons I thought they just had a 'Call of Doody' cock swallower style of paint job. But then I felt guilty when I read the name Ebba Akerlund, (who I had to look up here - http://archive.fo/3eQRj). Turns out she was an 11 year old partially deaf white girl, murdered by a failed asylum seeker, who supported the incompatible religion.
"For Rotherham" was also written on a magazine (as detailed here in the article https://archive.is/o62uh). If you weren't aware Rotherham is one of the dumping grounds for forced multiculturalism, which as it happened, forced itself on little white girls. The scandal exposed that the whole incident was known and covered up by the 'so called British Government', from police officers to local council leaders, those complicit in the crimes operated at many trusted levels in society.
The whole thing is the biggest shame any British man carries on his shoulders because WE let it happen and WE let it all get swept under the rug, even when it was exposed. This article (here https://archive.is/PCq5K) shed light on how the deputy leader of a council is said to have brokered a deal to get a relative of his who was a rape gang ring leader to hand over a 14 year old girl to the police, on the promise he wouldn't be prosecuted. Well as it turns out, that councillor's daughter has access to the confidential information on the victims of the mass rape, as she is a senior manager at the charity set up to help the victims of the immigrant mass rape.
So yes, I could understand that possibly "revenge" was his motive, but I couldn't say for definite as the authorities are outright censoring a lot of details. The man sent out a manifesto detailing his motives and ideologies, but when I have tried to search for the document online I have had Google censor it out (Google are Soviet tier level censors by the way) of results. When I have followed links to the document, I've had my internet service provider block my access, leaving me looking at a 403 screen - as if the page isn't there. A visit using a virtual private network or vpn for short, is a must as it revealed the links were there and that censorship in the West is epidemically out of control, as those in the seats of power are up to no good.
If his hero was Anders Breivik and he was all clued up on memes and politics, it doesn't make any sense he would shoot up some people just because they had an incompatible religion. He would have gone to the source of the problem, namely anywhere the certain benefactors of chaos reside. The politicians and the people who own them, the banking cartel or any other organisation that would look to force these people on you.
The whole thing seems very fishy and manufactured.
The motive for the shooting is, as yet, unknown. There have been strong suggestions that the shooter's motive was "revenge" against a religious ideology that is incompatible with the West. A piece of evidence backs up that claim, namely the writing of the victims of multiculturalism on the sides of his firearms.
Small admittance, when he first shown the weapons I thought they just had a 'Call of Doody' cock swallower style of paint job. But then I felt guilty when I read the name Ebba Akerlund, (who I had to look up here - http://archive.fo/3eQRj). Turns out she was an 11 year old partially deaf white girl, murdered by a failed asylum seeker, who supported the incompatible religion.
"For Rotherham" was also written on a magazine (as detailed here in the article https://archive.is/o62uh). If you weren't aware Rotherham is one of the dumping grounds for forced multiculturalism, which as it happened, forced itself on little white girls. The scandal exposed that the whole incident was known and covered up by the 'so called British Government', from police officers to local council leaders, those complicit in the crimes operated at many trusted levels in society.
The whole thing is the biggest shame any British man carries on his shoulders because WE let it happen and WE let it all get swept under the rug, even when it was exposed. This article (here https://archive.is/PCq5K) shed light on how the deputy leader of a council is said to have brokered a deal to get a relative of his who was a rape gang ring leader to hand over a 14 year old girl to the police, on the promise he wouldn't be prosecuted. Well as it turns out, that councillor's daughter has access to the confidential information on the victims of the mass rape, as she is a senior manager at the charity set up to help the victims of the immigrant mass rape.
So yes, I could understand that possibly "revenge" was his motive, but I couldn't say for definite as the authorities are outright censoring a lot of details. The man sent out a manifesto detailing his motives and ideologies, but when I have tried to search for the document online I have had Google censor it out (Google are Soviet tier level censors by the way) of results. When I have followed links to the document, I've had my internet service provider block my access, leaving me looking at a 403 screen - as if the page isn't there. A visit using a virtual private network or vpn for short, is a must as it revealed the links were there and that censorship in the West is epidemically out of control, as those in the seats of power are up to no good.
If his hero was Anders Breivik and he was all clued up on memes and politics, it doesn't make any sense he would shoot up some people just because they had an incompatible religion. He would have gone to the source of the problem, namely anywhere the certain benefactors of chaos reside. The politicians and the people who own them, the banking cartel or any other organisation that would look to force these people on you.
The whole thing seems very fishy and manufactured.
New Zealand Betrayed
So as Londonistan mayor, Sadgit Khan, (a follower of the incompatible religion) said - terror attacks are 'part and parcel of living in a big city' (here https://archive.is/t78Bc) . So did head on a stick female Prime Minister "Jacinda" get the message? After all a crime was committed and they caught the man, he goes to prison all is right with the world right?
NO, the toothy bitch looks to throw all the good people of New Zealand under the 'bus of peace' by stealing away their rights. She and her conspirators are looking to ban semiautomatic rifles (here https://archive.is/bOaOb). But does the West look to ban trucks or vans when the incompatible religion uses them to murder defenceless white people? Nope.
Maybe guns are a problem in New Zealand hey? Well let's have a quick Looky Lou. The New Zealand's own police records state that firearms were only used in homicides in 69 occurrences in the past decade - ten fucking years (here https://www.police.govt.nz/sites/default/files/publications/25-nov-2018-ir-01-18-17024.pdf).
But what about the actual number of deaths from firearms? Well in 2015 it was a measly 55 (check the rest of the numbers here https://archive.is/T1AaY ). That's fantastically low, you are more likely to find rocking horse shit than be shot in New Zealand. Let me put those low low firearm homicide rates into perspective for you. The population of New Zealand is around 4.6 million, with the estimated number of firearms being owned both legal and not legal being around 1.5 million.
Let's not beat around the bush, Jacinda and her co-conspirators are looking to steal rights away from law abiding New Zealanders, while hiding behind the facade of a mumsie figure who just wants 'to protect'. It's time to stop playing devil's advocate because at best she's a think cunt who shouldn't be in the job (that's with the benefit of the doubt) when in reality she's using the deaths of a group of people to remove freedom and forms of self defence away from the public.
Any cowardly fence sitter only has to look at the New Zealand so called 'police officers' looking to put people in prison for anywhere from 10-14 years - for sharing a fucking video. The people who side with this line of thinking don't belong in the West pure and simple - deport them to any diversity shit hole of their choosing.
Not content to block the people of New Zealand from seeing the facts for themselves and thereby having the best chance of accessing the truth (here https://archive.is/Okl2j), they then went on to harass business owners outside of New Zealand, so that they would supply them with user details. The NZHerald went on to write a hit piece about a non New Zealand business owner who dared stand up to this massive breach of New Zealander's rights (here https://archive.is/cQkdW).
As was mentioned in the article from OneAngryGamer the managing director at SparksNZ (a telecommunication giant in New Zealand, who's revenue is in the billions) was open in his support of state sponsored censorship see the images below.
NO, the toothy bitch looks to throw all the good people of New Zealand under the 'bus of peace' by stealing away their rights. She and her conspirators are looking to ban semiautomatic rifles (here https://archive.is/bOaOb). But does the West look to ban trucks or vans when the incompatible religion uses them to murder defenceless white people? Nope.
Maybe guns are a problem in New Zealand hey? Well let's have a quick Looky Lou. The New Zealand's own police records state that firearms were only used in homicides in 69 occurrences in the past decade - ten fucking years (here https://www.police.govt.nz/sites/default/files/publications/25-nov-2018-ir-01-18-17024.pdf).
But what about the actual number of deaths from firearms? Well in 2015 it was a measly 55 (check the rest of the numbers here https://archive.is/T1AaY ). That's fantastically low, you are more likely to find rocking horse shit than be shot in New Zealand. Let me put those low low firearm homicide rates into perspective for you. The population of New Zealand is around 4.6 million, with the estimated number of firearms being owned both legal and not legal being around 1.5 million.
Let's not beat around the bush, Jacinda and her co-conspirators are looking to steal rights away from law abiding New Zealanders, while hiding behind the facade of a mumsie figure who just wants 'to protect'. It's time to stop playing devil's advocate because at best she's a think cunt who shouldn't be in the job (that's with the benefit of the doubt) when in reality she's using the deaths of a group of people to remove freedom and forms of self defence away from the public.
Any cowardly fence sitter only has to look at the New Zealand so called 'police officers' looking to put people in prison for anywhere from 10-14 years - for sharing a fucking video. The people who side with this line of thinking don't belong in the West pure and simple - deport them to any diversity shit hole of their choosing.
Not content to block the people of New Zealand from seeing the facts for themselves and thereby having the best chance of accessing the truth (here https://archive.is/Okl2j), they then went on to harass business owners outside of New Zealand, so that they would supply them with user details. The NZHerald went on to write a hit piece about a non New Zealand business owner who dared stand up to this massive breach of New Zealander's rights (here https://archive.is/cQkdW).
As was mentioned in the article from OneAngryGamer the managing director at SparksNZ (a telecommunication giant in New Zealand, who's revenue is in the billions) was open in his support of state sponsored censorship see the images below.
At this point giant technology companies are laughing at the general public because of their state supported monopolies by whacking their dick on the cheek of the general public, in a 'what are you going to do about it?' way. Check the image below where this high ranking tech official, who is in line with the state, points to a media company who also happens to be in line with the state.
You might be familiar with the "I wonder if the inventors of the Internet had people like him in mind when they set out its purpose and freedoms many years ago" mindset comes from? It's along the same line the communist gun grabbers of Americaland use when they say 'the second amendment was only meant to cover muskets'.
I can answer emphatically yes the freedom of an individual to say no to a foreign power who is looking to over step it's charter and turn into an authoritarian shit hole IS why the internet has freedoms Moutter you condescending cunt.
Oh but the tech giant didn't just mouth off on Twatter, no they called on other technology monopolies like Goggle and Fakebook to join in on the censorship orgy (here https://archive.is/3Avnt). Can't have the general public knowing the truth, can't have them talking now can we. You fuckers have had a little bit too much to think.
Here is a bonus link to the cunt Jacinda dressed like a incompatible religion cult member, I wonder if she's walking behind her husband? (here https://archive.is/LkKUp warning pictures and propaganda piece may make you sick).
I can answer emphatically yes the freedom of an individual to say no to a foreign power who is looking to over step it's charter and turn into an authoritarian shit hole IS why the internet has freedoms Moutter you condescending cunt.
Oh but the tech giant didn't just mouth off on Twatter, no they called on other technology monopolies like Goggle and Fakebook to join in on the censorship orgy (here https://archive.is/3Avnt). Can't have the general public knowing the truth, can't have them talking now can we. You fuckers have had a little bit too much to think.
Here is a bonus link to the cunt Jacinda dressed like a incompatible religion cult member, I wonder if she's walking behind her husband? (here https://archive.is/LkKUp warning pictures and propaganda piece may make you sick).
The West needs to lead the way
If someone takes money without your consent - it's theft.
If someone touches you without your consent - it's assault.
If someone has sex with you without your consent - it's rape.
Things being done to you without your consent are a crime, so choose your OWN leaders, not the fake choices offered to you. Remove your consent to be governed by those who are obviously looking to harm you and your culture.
The West has had its struggles co-opted by those looking to infiltrate and destroy us from within - time to send them packing. There is nowhere to emigrate to any more, so running away is no longer an option. A rather large net of conspirators are working together to destroy all white societies and has been very successful in ruining millions of lives - time for the great correction and to get back on track.
Look at the senator in Australia who was assaulted for daring to speak about the problems his nation faces (here https://archive.is/8ewMP). You'll see the press bias if you search for it yourself, they all call the attacker a 'boy'. You know it's just kids being kids assaulting politicians for their point of view, wacka wacka, nothing to see here, but look how the nasty man over reacts by lashing out at a defenceless kid who was just casually assaulting him from behind
For all the "leaders" who want the West to be a third world shit hole, we'll just expel them to the third world shit hole of their choosing. As for the leadership that we put in their place, it's obvious that the government and large corporation's powers need to be severely reduced, as it is too harmful when a great deal of power is in the hands of only a few.
The only governments that condone censorship are those who don't want you talking about the abuse you are receiving. Similar anyone looking to remove a free person's right to defend themselves, shows their intent on injuring you and reminds you they intend on you not being a free person anymore.
If someone touches you without your consent - it's assault.
If someone has sex with you without your consent - it's rape.
Things being done to you without your consent are a crime, so choose your OWN leaders, not the fake choices offered to you. Remove your consent to be governed by those who are obviously looking to harm you and your culture.
The West has had its struggles co-opted by those looking to infiltrate and destroy us from within - time to send them packing. There is nowhere to emigrate to any more, so running away is no longer an option. A rather large net of conspirators are working together to destroy all white societies and has been very successful in ruining millions of lives - time for the great correction and to get back on track.
Look at the senator in Australia who was assaulted for daring to speak about the problems his nation faces (here https://archive.is/8ewMP). You'll see the press bias if you search for it yourself, they all call the attacker a 'boy'. You know it's just kids being kids assaulting politicians for their point of view, wacka wacka, nothing to see here, but look how the nasty man over reacts by lashing out at a defenceless kid who was just casually assaulting him from behind
For all the "leaders" who want the West to be a third world shit hole, we'll just expel them to the third world shit hole of their choosing. As for the leadership that we put in their place, it's obvious that the government and large corporation's powers need to be severely reduced, as it is too harmful when a great deal of power is in the hands of only a few.
The only governments that condone censorship are those who don't want you talking about the abuse you are receiving. Similar anyone looking to remove a free person's right to defend themselves, shows their intent on injuring you and reminds you they intend on you not being a free person anymore.
By Roley
19/03/2019
19/03/2019