The cake is a lie
We've all been in this situation, you want a delicious cake (mmm delicious normal cake), after all there is nothing better than a slice of cake and a cup of tea. Now on our beautiful wholesome cake, we obviously want to decorate this cute little sweet treat with a couple of children's characters and a message that you should be in favour of 'men ramming their cocks up other mens' shit pipes'.
Now while we are thinking straight, where shall we decide to have this cake made? Maybe at one of the many openly gay bakeries, the kind that always push a gay agenda, set in a gay policed area, that occasionally discriminates against straight people? After all ,they think the same way as us, heck they might even give us a discount for pushing out the same gay agenda as them, fuck we might even swap HIV strains near the bins out the back.
Well at a push we could just go to one of the many normal businesses that would have no problem printing this message - I mean most of them have been bullied into doing anything, it should make it really easy.
No, I know, let's go to somewhere that is obviously not going to want to promote this faecal soaked bellend agenda, nothing says 'we is all equal 'n' shit' quite like forcing yourself on someone who is powerless to defend themselves.
Now while we are thinking straight, where shall we decide to have this cake made? Maybe at one of the many openly gay bakeries, the kind that always push a gay agenda, set in a gay policed area, that occasionally discriminates against straight people? After all ,they think the same way as us, heck they might even give us a discount for pushing out the same gay agenda as them, fuck we might even swap HIV strains near the bins out the back.
Well at a push we could just go to one of the many normal businesses that would have no problem printing this message - I mean most of them have been bullied into doing anything, it should make it really easy.
No, I know, let's go to somewhere that is obviously not going to want to promote this faecal soaked bellend agenda, nothing says 'we is all equal 'n' shit' quite like forcing yourself on someone who is powerless to defend themselves.
Just Deserts
But scarily enough that's exactly what a gay zealot did, they went into a religious bakery full well knowing they would not want to promote their message and then got 'offended' when they did what every rational person knew they would do - say no thank you.
This was obviously a spineless strategy, used to cause fear and harm to the young couple running the bakery and to be honest feels like it was done out of pure malice. Not only was this vile attack an attempt to destroy the young straight couple's reputation in the eyes of the public, but also to cause them financial ruin if they dared challenge the gay fascist agenda. Luckily they believe in a made up God, so a gang of people who also believe in the fairy tale could help them defend their livelihoods (normal people might not be as fortunate).
The gay guy causing this misery however was backed by the state or to be more specific - the Equality Commission for Northern Ireland. The "Equality Commission" was backing the right to force a straight couple to condone something they don't believe in, even going to the disgusting lengths of wasting around £250,000 of tax payer' funds. I guess we know why governments say we have to cut back on essentials like the NHS - so we can fund stupid shit like this.
We all know they would have sold him a plain cake, even if he had rode to to the shop on a pink unicorn singing It's Raining Men, they just felt uncomfortable with the message he could have got done nearly anywhere else or even done himself.
This shameful ordeal was brought to a head when the supreme court came to the correct unanimous conclusion, that neither the state, an individual nor a group should be able to force another individual to promote or condone a political opinion he does not believe in - a victory for common sense and the United Kingdom as a whole.
What people need to be aware is that any rational normal person can say they don't like homosexuality, most people don't, they just don't say anything out of wanting to be polite and not wanting to hurt anyone's feelings - after all you don't have to be part of a religious group to have a set of beliefs.
One thing people used to be cautious of was being called homophobic, but anyone intelligent saw through that disgusting misuse of language. You see the term is not actually a phobia, but a term carefully crafted to con the regular person into thinking it's bad. The term is often attributed to Jewish psychotherapist George Weinberg, a man who sought to stigmatise normal people who thought there was something off about men being attracted to other mens hairy sweaty arse's.
This was obviously a spineless strategy, used to cause fear and harm to the young couple running the bakery and to be honest feels like it was done out of pure malice. Not only was this vile attack an attempt to destroy the young straight couple's reputation in the eyes of the public, but also to cause them financial ruin if they dared challenge the gay fascist agenda. Luckily they believe in a made up God, so a gang of people who also believe in the fairy tale could help them defend their livelihoods (normal people might not be as fortunate).
The gay guy causing this misery however was backed by the state or to be more specific - the Equality Commission for Northern Ireland. The "Equality Commission" was backing the right to force a straight couple to condone something they don't believe in, even going to the disgusting lengths of wasting around £250,000 of tax payer' funds. I guess we know why governments say we have to cut back on essentials like the NHS - so we can fund stupid shit like this.
We all know they would have sold him a plain cake, even if he had rode to to the shop on a pink unicorn singing It's Raining Men, they just felt uncomfortable with the message he could have got done nearly anywhere else or even done himself.
This shameful ordeal was brought to a head when the supreme court came to the correct unanimous conclusion, that neither the state, an individual nor a group should be able to force another individual to promote or condone a political opinion he does not believe in - a victory for common sense and the United Kingdom as a whole.
What people need to be aware is that any rational normal person can say they don't like homosexuality, most people don't, they just don't say anything out of wanting to be polite and not wanting to hurt anyone's feelings - after all you don't have to be part of a religious group to have a set of beliefs.
One thing people used to be cautious of was being called homophobic, but anyone intelligent saw through that disgusting misuse of language. You see the term is not actually a phobia, but a term carefully crafted to con the regular person into thinking it's bad. The term is often attributed to Jewish psychotherapist George Weinberg, a man who sought to stigmatise normal people who thought there was something off about men being attracted to other mens hairy sweaty arse's.
A bad taste in your mouth
This case is further evidence of the state overreaching into our lives. A government unrestrained in its growth and reach will fritter our hard earned money away on ill thought out pet projects, that those at the head of will use as social currency because they are cunts with nothing better to do.
It's also the symptom of the long running problem of deferring automatic scepticism of people who wear a uniform. Our job in securing society is to protect the role, not the man. We have this blind following brought on by cowardice and laziness as opposed to a constant vigilance to ensure the correct man is in the correct role.
Scientists invented the plastics that pollute our very existence, yet the news run with the headline 'Scientist warn us that we've fucked the planet' - so pay 5p for your plastic bag or we'll stick a straw in another turtle's nose you bastards.
Doctors were used in adverts for cigarettes for the same reason - people just blindly trust the position.
So here we had Weinberg, a gay agenda pusher, who met with clandestine groups that would call themselves "homophiles" and meet to plan how they were going to normalise deviant and degenerate behaviour and no one looked to stop him. He perverted society by taking advantage of his position and people's misplaced trust in his role to cause all kinds of damage. It would seem this type of people and their cabal's are the source for the 'ists' and 'isms' that were invented to destroy the west today.
It's definitely going to take some further investigation by us (by us I mean me and you reading this you lazy bastard) to unearth the extent of the damage and come up with a suitable solution.
It did get me wondering about the children's characters used on the cake and why they were used, even raised the question of whether those popular characters were licensed to be sold on a cake or not.
Maybe they used the Muppets in an attempt to corrupt the image of children's characters, but I like to think it's because by the time a gay man has settled down to get married, their arsehole resembles the entrance to a sock puppet.
It's also the symptom of the long running problem of deferring automatic scepticism of people who wear a uniform. Our job in securing society is to protect the role, not the man. We have this blind following brought on by cowardice and laziness as opposed to a constant vigilance to ensure the correct man is in the correct role.
Scientists invented the plastics that pollute our very existence, yet the news run with the headline 'Scientist warn us that we've fucked the planet' - so pay 5p for your plastic bag or we'll stick a straw in another turtle's nose you bastards.
Doctors were used in adverts for cigarettes for the same reason - people just blindly trust the position.
So here we had Weinberg, a gay agenda pusher, who met with clandestine groups that would call themselves "homophiles" and meet to plan how they were going to normalise deviant and degenerate behaviour and no one looked to stop him. He perverted society by taking advantage of his position and people's misplaced trust in his role to cause all kinds of damage. It would seem this type of people and their cabal's are the source for the 'ists' and 'isms' that were invented to destroy the west today.
It's definitely going to take some further investigation by us (by us I mean me and you reading this you lazy bastard) to unearth the extent of the damage and come up with a suitable solution.
It did get me wondering about the children's characters used on the cake and why they were used, even raised the question of whether those popular characters were licensed to be sold on a cake or not.
Maybe they used the Muppets in an attempt to corrupt the image of children's characters, but I like to think it's because by the time a gay man has settled down to get married, their arsehole resembles the entrance to a sock puppet.
By Roley
12/10/2018
12/10/2018
